recommendations-server: better example domains

[sourcejedi]

We need more than one example domain. .example TLD is defined for this purpose. Let's use it.

https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2606 - "Reserved Top Level DNS Names".

Also add missing quotes around one URI. We do not want these URIs to be clickable.

[kjetilk]

I like the idea that we use .example for those where we use an invalid domain, but since example.org is a valid domain to use in the same context per the RFC, I think we might as well keep that. But my opinion isn't strong, so lets await more reviews.

[kjetilk]

This came out wrong, though :-)

[sourcejedi]

I've fixed my mistake :-).

I don't understand. Do you mean to use example.org and app.example as the two domains?

example.org was fine, but then it means http://app.org is confusing. It is not an RFC-reserved example domain. It doesn't show anything to do with the SOLID spec either. Maybe it is a SOLID domain and you plan to make it make more sense in future? but this is not clear to me as a reader at the moment... And if SOLID has set up a domain they are using to represent apps, it makes you wonder why there is not a SOLID-specific domain to represent servers?

(edited: the domain used was "example.org" not "example.net", sorry).

[kjetilk]

I've fixed my mistake :-).

Great! :-)

example.net was fine, but then it means http://app.org is confusing.

Yeah, what I meant was using example.org and app.example.

[justinwb]

LGTM

[kjetilk]

Indeed, this is good to go.