This repository was archived by the owner on Oct 6, 2023. It is now read-only.
refactor: use lodash-es over lodash - #242
Merged
Merged
Conversation
kanadgupta
marked this pull request as ready for review
September 21, 2023 18:42
kanadgupta
commented
Sep 21, 2023
| "unicorn/prefer-node-protocol": "error", | ||
|
|
||
| "you-dont-need-lodash-underscore/get": "off", | ||
| "you-dont-need-lodash-underscore/set": "off" |
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
this rule doesn't exist!
This was referenced Sep 21, 2023
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
🧰 Changes
Fixes an issue I saw when attempting to bump this package dep in readmeio/api#735:
🧬 QA & Testing
This project is ESM already so I think this should be a patch change. If tests pass then I think we should be good to go!