Fix missing Optional typing - #411
Merged
Merged
Conversation
psss
approved these changes
Jun 19, 2025
psss
force-pushed
the
no_implicit_optional
branch
from
June 19, 2025 14:21
74fdf97 to
5fc4fcf
Compare
PEP 484 prohibits implicit Optional. Signed-off-by: Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo@redhat.com>
sandrobonazzola
force-pushed
the
no_implicit_optional
branch
from
June 23, 2025 11:17
5fc4fcf to
f9d7daa
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
PEP 484 prohibits implicit Optional.