Skip to content

Improve replicated gateway display in older CLIs#3975

Merged
jvstme merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
issue_3959_multi_replica_display_in_older_cli
Jun 17, 2026
Merged

Improve replicated gateway display in older CLIs#3975
jvstme merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
issue_3959_multi_replica_display_in_older_cli

Conversation

@jvstme

@jvstme jvstme commented Jun 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Adjust server-side gateway object patching for
pre-0.20.25 clients, so that such clients display
all replica hostnames (even though they are not
aware of replicated gateways).

Before:

$ dstack --version
0.20.24

$ dstack gateway list
 NAME        BACKEND         HOSTNAME  DOMAIN       DEFAULT  STATUS
 replicated  gcp (us-west4)            example.com           running

After:

$ dstack gateway list
 NAME        BACKEND         HOSTNAME        DOMAIN       DEFAULT  STATUS
 replicated  gcp (us-west4)  34.125.203.210  example.com           running
                             34.186.30.65

#3959

Adjust server-side gateway object patching for
pre-0.20.25 clients, so that such clients display
all replica hostnames (even though they are not
aware of replicated gateways).

Before:

```shell
$ dstack --version
0.20.24

$ dstack gateway list
 NAME        BACKEND         HOSTNAME  DOMAIN       DEFAULT  STATUS
 replicated  gcp (us-west4)            example.com           running
```

After:

```shell
$ dstack gateway list
 NAME        BACKEND         HOSTNAME        DOMAIN       DEFAULT  STATUS
 replicated  gcp (us-west4)  34.125.203.210  example.com           running
                             34.186.30.65
```
@jvstme jvstme requested a review from r4victor June 16, 2026 20:56
@jvstme jvstme merged commit b4839c1 into master Jun 17, 2026
24 checks passed
@jvstme jvstme deleted the issue_3959_multi_replica_display_in_older_cli branch June 17, 2026 10:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants