<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xml:lang="en" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><title>Recent changes to feature-requests</title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/trackplus/feature-requests/" rel="alternate"/><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/trackplus/feature-requests/feed.atom" rel="self"/><id>https://sourceforge.net/p/trackplus/feature-requests/</id><updated>2009-08-12T20:11:38Z</updated><subtitle>Recent changes to feature-requests</subtitle><entry><title>JSR Compliant Porlets</title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/trackplus/feature-requests/96/" rel="alternate"/><published>2009-08-12T20:11:38Z</published><updated>2009-08-12T20:11:38Z</updated><author><name>RecentCoin</name><uri>https://sourceforge.net/u/midirr/</uri></author><id>https://sourceforge.net45150ea39a7e734b8a1ba6e4a8ae37ee8fc5374a</id><summary type="html">&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Have you considered releasing this as portlets?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary></entry><entry><title>Running saved TQL queries from bookmarks/links</title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/trackplus/feature-requests/95/" rel="alternate"/><published>2006-06-07T23:15:18Z</published><updated>2006-06-07T23:15:18Z</updated><author><name>tenwit</name><uri>https://sourceforge.net/u/tenwit/</uri></author><id>https://sourceforge.net15ccdd8d3b6b598313cb88da333079f5e239fe1d</id><summary type="html">&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;I make extensive use of saved TQL queries.  I'd like to&lt;br /&gt;
be able to make links (including browser bookmarks) to&lt;br /&gt;
saved queries, for convenience.  So to run a query&lt;br /&gt;
saved as (e.g.) "OrigByMeSorted", I might go directly&lt;br /&gt;
to an URL like&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://trackplus/track-v/tql.do?execute=OrigByMeSorted" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://trackplus/track-v/tql.do?execute=OrigByMeSorted&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;..or whatever.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary></entry><entry><title>Configure PDF report info like regular reports.</title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/trackplus/feature-requests/94/" rel="alternate"/><published>2006-01-16T10:18:02Z</published><updated>2006-01-16T10:18:02Z</updated><author><name>Roger Stoffers</name><uri>https://sourceforge.net/u/stoffers/</uri></author><id>https://sourceforge.net1cdd4c1ec670fa6c146033738e4aab8b10468f03</id><summary type="html">&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Currently, normal reports allow much more freedom than&lt;br /&gt;
PDF reports.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Please allow export to PDF to display the same data as&lt;br /&gt;
normal reports. Perhaps some XSL/FOP could do the trick?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary></entry><entry><title>Ability to update more than 1 issue at the same time</title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/trackplus/feature-requests/93/" rel="alternate"/><published>2005-08-31T13:12:28Z</published><updated>2005-08-31T13:12:28Z</updated><author><name>Anonymous</name><uri>https://sourceforge.net/u/userid-None/</uri></author><id>https://sourceforge.net62f419c85a5e70d6831e160863f8fbd17832db9d</id><summary type="html">&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hi there Dev team&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am the same guy who submitted&lt;br /&gt;
"Microsoft Outlook like interface". I would like to &lt;br /&gt;
suggest the following feature.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Use Case&lt;br /&gt;
-------------&lt;br /&gt;
I request the build team to build folliwng 25 issues in the &lt;br /&gt;
next build. The build team does the same and would &lt;br /&gt;
like to update the 25 issues resolution to "BUILT". They &lt;br /&gt;
should be able to select all these issues (maybe like &lt;br /&gt;
emails in HOTMAIL) and then click on a drop down that &lt;br /&gt;
says *********Mass Update the following ************. &lt;br /&gt;
One of the items in drop down is Resolution. A little &lt;br /&gt;
window pops up that lets you select the new resolution. &lt;br /&gt;
All 25 issues then have this new resolution.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;------------------------&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The above is one example. We could think of many &lt;br /&gt;
others including Responsible, Traget Release, etc&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OSM&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary></entry><entry><title>Issue Locking</title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/trackplus/feature-requests/92/" rel="alternate"/><published>2005-08-31T09:45:31Z</published><updated>2005-08-31T09:45:31Z</updated><author><name>Joerg Friedrich</name><uri>https://sourceforge.net/u/friedj/</uri></author><id>https://sourceforge.neta91ee3b4953ce55ec635dfbafe6c0fc08831126e</id><summary type="html">&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Right now issues are not locked when they are being&lt;br /&gt;
edited. This can lead to race conditions. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It would be nice if issue would be locked when somebody&lt;br /&gt;
has them opened for editig, and editing is prevented in&lt;br /&gt;
case they are being locked.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It must be ensured, that locks are automatically&lt;br /&gt;
released after some timeout.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary></entry><entry><title>Microsoft Outlook like interface</title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/trackplus/feature-requests/91/" rel="alternate"/><published>2005-08-28T11:05:06Z</published><updated>2005-08-28T11:05:06Z</updated><author><name>Anonymous</name><uri>https://sourceforge.net/u/userid-None/</uri></author><id>https://sourceforge.netd5f78681c9b8a8e70c42b0dcab737838ce08579e</id><summary type="html">&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;This is a great product. But usability is lacking. I would &lt;br /&gt;
suggest making the UI something like MS Outlook...i.e &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;-Pre-defines queries on the left ...these queries could be &lt;br /&gt;
organized in folders which may represent a release.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;-List of issues of a query to be shown on top right pane&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- Details of selected issue below that in a separate pane.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary></entry><entry><title>Support for group management</title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/trackplus/feature-requests/90/" rel="alternate"/><published>2005-08-16T07:26:04Z</published><updated>2005-08-16T07:26:04Z</updated><author><name>Roger Stoffers</name><uri>https://sourceforge.net/u/stoffers/</uri></author><id>https://sourceforge.neta4918faab03a1e35233e2ca671b0cde41f88a2a8</id><summary type="html">&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Please build user/group management. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This way you can assign (make responsible) issues to a&lt;br /&gt;
group of people instead of one person. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Everybody who is a member of this group is allowed to&lt;br /&gt;
pick-up an issue and solve it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Kind regards,&lt;br /&gt;
Roger Stoffers (Vodafone NL)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary></entry><entry><title>Could you add the EndDate to the report.jsp</title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/trackplus/feature-requests/89/" rel="alternate"/><published>2005-08-16T06:10:33Z</published><updated>2005-08-16T06:10:33Z</updated><author><name>Alain Viret</name><uri>https://sourceforge.net/u/aviret/</uri></author><id>https://sourceforge.netf4e17933cbf3063de5f884ea739209cb74f3776f</id><summary type="html">&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;I have just added the EndDate to the report.jsp, could&lt;br /&gt;
you please add it to your distribution (if it makes&lt;br /&gt;
senses for you, but that's the in our Track+ usage).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I join my own report.jsp file at this RFE.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best regards,&lt;br /&gt;
Alain&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary></entry><entry><title>Chronological list of all changes of an item</title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/trackplus/feature-requests/88/" rel="alternate"/><published>2005-07-28T12:15:04Z</published><updated>2005-07-28T12:15:04Z</updated><author><name>Michael</name><uri>https://sourceforge.net/u/sumido/</uri></author><id>https://sourceforge.netf6bea8a9e081c77401906ed61687322b26ec2ee6</id><summary type="html">&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;All changes of one item are listed not in a chronological &lt;br /&gt;
order but in three sections. 1) Change of State &lt;br /&gt;
(Zustandsänderung); 2) Audit Trail; 3) Schedule &lt;br /&gt;
(Planungsverlauf). &lt;br /&gt;
If someone adds a comment it will appear in the &lt;br /&gt;
section Audit Trail, but only if the state doesnt change, &lt;br /&gt;
otherwise it will be shown in the first section.&lt;br /&gt;
If you try to retrace all comments and changes you &lt;br /&gt;
basically have to puzzle all changes from all sections &lt;br /&gt;
together. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Why isnt there a chronological list of all entries (by &lt;br /&gt;
default, or either optional or configurable).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The split listing maybe useful for some management &lt;br /&gt;
slides, but in practice this leads often to confusion.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary></entry><entry><title>non-anonymous ldap searches</title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/trackplus/feature-requests/87/" rel="alternate"/><published>2005-02-22T18:31:14Z</published><updated>2005-02-22T18:31:14Z</updated><author><name>Bryan Ragon</name><uri>https://sourceforge.net/u/fancylad/</uri></author><id>https://sourceforge.nete02a60799e3c9ad92386f3859c54bb3c6de518dc</id><summary type="html">&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;add configuration parameters for a non-anonymous&lt;br /&gt;
search.  When logging on Track+ currently connect to&lt;br /&gt;
the ldap server as an anonymous user to search for the&lt;br /&gt;
uid.  Our LDAP server does not allow anonymous searches.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary></entry></feed>