On 23/7/26 17:18, Bin Meng wrote:
The SDHCI model processes the first ADMA descriptor batch inside the
command MMIO write, then resumes pending batches before every later
SDHCI MMIO read or write. This makes register access perform bulk DMA
work and can delay a status read even when completion bits are set.

On the Icicle Kit, U-Boot uses ADMA2-64 and CMD18 to load a roughly
19 MiB FIT image from SD. It can report:

   Timeout for status update: 00000001 00000001
   Timeout for status update: 00000003 00000001

The status already contains the requested Command Complete bit, and may
also contain Transfer Complete. However, reading the interrupt status
first executes a pending ADMA batch. The MMIO read can therefore return
after U-Boot has reached its one-second polling deadline.

Turn the existing transfer timer into an ADMA-only engine. Starting an
ADMA command arms the engine directly, and each timer callback runs one
bounded batch before yielding. MMIO reads and writes no longer perform
or schedule ADMA work. Keep PIO and SDMA synchronous.

Cancel the engine and clear ADMA activity and error state on DATA or ALL
reset.

Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <[email protected]>
---

  hw/sd/sdhci.c | 140 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
  1 file changed, 86 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)


-static void sdhci_do_adma(SDHCIState *s)
+static void sdhci_adma_run_batch(SDHCIState *s)
  {
      unsigned int begin, length;
      const uint16_t block_size = s->blksize & BLOCK_SIZE_MASK;
@@ -956,12 +990,15 @@ static void sdhci_do_adma(SDHCIState *s)
              }
              if (res != MEMTX_OK) {
                  s->data_count = 0;
+                s->admaerr &= ~SDHC_ADMAERR_STATE_MASK;
+                s->admaerr |= SDHC_ADMAERR_STATE_ST_TFR;
                  if (s->errintstsen & SDHC_EISEN_ADMAERR) {
                      trace_sdhci_error("Set ADMA error flag");
                      s->errintsts |= SDHC_EIS_ADMAERR;
                      s->norintsts |= SDHC_NIS_ERR;
                  }
                  sdhci_update_irq(s);
+                return;
              } else {
                  s->admasysaddr += dscr.incr;
              }

This now reads better as "if block to handle error and return":

-- >8 --
@@ -999,9 +999,8 @@ static void sdhci_adma_run_batch(SDHCIState *s)
                 }
                 sdhci_update_irq(s);
                 return;
-            } else {
-                s->admasysaddr += dscr.incr;
             }
+            s->admasysaddr += dscr.incr;
             break;
---

Reply via email to