lobster vs steak - he ordered a steak. wtf. we supposed to eat lobster.
cultured meat is deemed the solution to malpractices in rearing, slaughtering and live animal exports. veganism trying to convince that cultured meat is the most humane way to consume animal without having to harm or sacrifice lives. it is a technology that deconstruct every essence that made up an animal and put them back together to make up succulent patties, identical to real, tender, juicy meat only lack of its provenance. cultured meat set up a new paradigm for agrotechnology, not only we are able to exclude ourselves from the absurdity of rearing and growing animals in confinement until they have grown fat enough for slaughtering, we also do not have to deal with their dirty droppings. this so called cellular engineering/technology is nothing against natural order any more than making tempeh or baking an orange cake. its constituent elements, amino acids, water, fat and carbohydrate are exactly the same except the mammalian cell origin. if we exclude the mammalian cells with yeast or bacteria, would it still be "meat"? eating meat has always been the object of criticism for over consumption of resources i.e. land, air, water and crops. that does not mean that we could not work out with sustainable animal husbandry and preservation of ecosystem. opting to cellular engineering only exposes our credulity and desire to keep steak on the plate in the most humane way while closing one eye on real issues regarding technology disparity, inequalities, unfair global trade and subsidies wrecking up small countries and infant industries. why food need to be made in absurdly un-economical way like cellular engineering? the process of making cultured meat leverages the existing techniques used in the animal and plant cell culture for biotechnology, tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. it is unnecessary and expensive, we should actually pay heed to resist the urge that this technology could save the world from environmental problems and climate change. revolutionary food technology should address issues on malnutrition and hunger. apparently 1 in every 5 children go to bed hungry every night. thousands have to skip meals just to let their loved ones to have something to eat. given enough political will and support, we could tackle all these problems with environment, social inequality climate change and hunger simultaneously. technology like cellular engineering for food should be reserved for drug development and regenerative medicine.
cultured meat is deemed the solution to malpractices in rearing, slaughtering and live animal exports. veganism trying to convince that cultured meat is the most humane way to consume animal without having to harm or sacrifice lives. it is a technology that deconstruct every essence that made up an animal and put them back together to make up succulent patties, identical to real, tender, juicy meat only lack of its provenance. cultured meat set up a new paradigm for agrotechnology, not only we are able to exclude ourselves from the absurdity of rearing and growing animals in confinement until they have grown fat enough for slaughtering, we also do not have to deal with their dirty droppings. this so called cellular engineering/technology is nothing against natural order any more than making tempeh or baking an orange cake. its constituent elements, amino acids, water, fat and carbohydrate are exactly the same except the mammalian cell origin. if we exclude the mammalian cells with yeast or bacteria, would it still be "meat"? eating meat has always been the object of criticism for over consumption of resources i.e. land, air, water and crops. that does not mean that we could not work out with sustainable animal husbandry and preservation of ecosystem. opting to cellular engineering only exposes our credulity and desire to keep steak on the plate in the most humane way while closing one eye on real issues regarding technology disparity, inequalities, unfair global trade and subsidies wrecking up small countries and infant industries. why food need to be made in absurdly un-economical way like cellular engineering? the process of making cultured meat leverages the existing techniques used in the animal and plant cell culture for biotechnology, tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. it is unnecessary and expensive, we should actually pay heed to resist the urge that this technology could save the world from environmental problems and climate change. revolutionary food technology should address issues on malnutrition and hunger. apparently 1 in every 5 children go to bed hungry every night. thousands have to skip meals just to let their loved ones to have something to eat. given enough political will and support, we could tackle all these problems with environment, social inequality climate change and hunger simultaneously. technology like cellular engineering for food should be reserved for drug development and regenerative medicine.
------------------------------------------------
animal cell engineering will be offered after the mid-term

