[Jprogramming] tacit

[Hauke Rehr]

sorry for the bad naming,
I rewrote it too many times.

whatshappeningalready is the same as v in my earlier post

I had a working modifier mymod and wanted
    (u;v) mymod n y
or
    u`v mymod n y
to work like
    (v {. u mycurrentmod n y) ; }. u mycurrentmod n y
but without the two executions of u mycurrentmod n y
and without assigning its result.

Am 02.06.20 um 11:53 schrieb Hauke Rehr:
> What you say is like
> (}. ;~ whatshappeningalready@{.)@u
> The problem is:
> whatshappeningalready uses [ and ] of the enclosing verb
> (ex- or implicitly)
> I could do
> (}. ;~ wha2)@([;];u)
> for some value of wha2 (an adjusted way of whatshappeningalready)
> but I thought maybe there’s a more elegant way of achieving this.
> 
> Am 02.06.20 um 11:39 schrieb Raul Miller:
>> Probably?
>>
>> But you don't need a gerund, just accessors
>>
>> Basically, you'll do something like (expr)@:u or ([: expr u), and in
>> the context of expr, 0&{:: gets the contents of the first box and
>> 1&{:: gets the contents of the second box.
>>
>> You may also want to do something like (expr)@:(+each&(0;0))@:u to
>> enforce a structure on the result of u.
>>
>> That said, once I learned this technique, I discarded it -- I feel
>> that explicit local names are a better choice.
>>
>> Still, this might help?
>>
> 

-- 
----------------------
mail written using NEO
neo-layout.org