[Jprogramming] Tacit definition involving adverb argument

['Pascal Jasmin' via Programming]

(+/)`%`# 1 : ' ''`f g h'' =. m label_. (f g h) f.'
+/ % #




----- Original Message -----
From: Moon S <moon.aka.sun at gmail.com>
To: programming <programming at jsoftware.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 5, 2017 7:26 PM
Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] Tacit definition involving adverb argument

Ah! The special form for }

x (v0`v1`v2)} y

Great!

What about a user-defined adverb? If I define an adverb to pretend I
can have three parameters.


On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 1:53 AM, 'Pascal Jasmin' via Programming
<programming at jsoftware.com> wrote:
> 11 22 33&( 0:`(<:@])`[}) 2
> 11 0 33
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Moon S <moon.aka.sun at gmail.com>
> To: programming <programming at jsoftware.com>
> Sent: Thursday, January 5, 2017 6:36 PM
> Subject: [Jprogramming] Tacit definition involving adverb argument
>
> Is there a tacit definition of such a verb? Is there a way to pass a
> value to the adverb?
>
> f =: 3 : '0 (<:y)} 11 22 33'
>
>    f 1
> 0 22 33
>    f 2
> 11 0 33
>
>
> PS. Also, I couldn't suspect that besides a usual definition of dyad
> adverb such as
>
> 1 : ('';':';'...x...m...y...')  NB. explicit defs inside
>
> there's also a shorter way:
>
> 1 : '...[...x...]...'  NB. tacit defs inside
>
> Of course the reading of The Phrases is very useful... but so hard!
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm