[Jprogramming] Gustafson's Unums Revisited

[robert therriault]

Hey Skip,

You could capture that structure yourself using +. couldn't you? It may not be as nice as having the display done
natively, but the information is not really thrown away.

 +. 3j0
3 0
   +. 3
3 0

Cheers, bob

> On Aug 18, 2016, at 9:44 PM, Skip Cave <skip at caveconsulting.com> wrote:
> 
> If we did have a display verb that could always show the
> zero-imaginary-part of complex numbers in storage, then we would have to
> use that verb every time we displayed output that might be complex, if we
> wanted to see any zero imaginary part.