[Jprogramming] Source of frustration

[Linda Alvord]

They didn't really. It was just a few samples and a guess.  I often had
trouble going from tacit to explicit and I couldn't find the arguments or
how [ and [ were involved. Some of the fog is lifting.

Linda

-----Original Message-----
From: programming-bounces at forums.jsoftware.com
[mailto:programming-bounces at forums.jsoftware.com] On Behalf Of Brian Schott
Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2015 11:53 AM
To: programming at jsoftware.com
Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] Source of frustration

I think it is always possible to @ instead of [: , but I don't know for
sure. In any case, occasionally I find [: easier to use than @ , just as you
do.

I cannot understand how your examples address the question.

---
(B=)

> On Feb 13, 2015, at 5:17 PM, Linda Alvord <lindaalvord at verizon.net> wrote:
> 
> Brian, I like 9!: combinaions. Is it true that you can always remove 
> [: from a tacit monadic function?
> 
> Also, it doesn't seem to be possible to remove all  of them from a 
> dyadic verb.  Here's some examples from code run in a terminal:
> 
> 9!:3]5 
>   see=: 13 :'(i.x)+/i.y#x'
>   3 see 2
> 0 1  2
> 3 4  5
> 6 7  8
> 
> 1 2  3
> 4 5  6
> 7 8  9
> 
> 2 3  4
> 5 6  7
> 8 9 10
>   see
> ([: i. [) +/ [: i. #~
>   9!:3]5
>   cbB=: 13 :'<"0@>:@i.y'
>   pairs=: 13 :'(>:@i. x),"0/>:@i. y'  
>   countB =: <@cb"1 at pairs
> 
>   cbB
> <"0@>:@i.
>   pairs
> ([: >:@i. [) ,"0/ [: >:@i. ]
>   countB
> <@cb"1 at pairs
> 
>   Linda
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm