[Jprogramming] Problems displaying the alphabet in J701gtk and J701jhs

[Björn Helgason]

It looks better like this

u:&.>0,&.>3 u: 16 16 $a.

2012/2/4 Björn Helgason <gosinn at gmail.com>

>    32 16   $;u:&.>0,&.>3 u: 16 16 $a.
>
>
>
>
> ┌┬┐├┼┤└┴
> ┘│─
>  !"#$%&'
> ()*+,-./
> 01234567
> 89:;<=>?
> @ABCDEFG
> HIJKLMNO
> PQRSTUVW
> XYZ[\]^_
> `abcdefg
> hijklmno
> pqrstuvw
> xyz{|}~
> € ‚ƒ„…†‡
> ˆ‰Š‹Œ Ž
> ‘’“”•–—
> ˜™š›œ žŸ
>  ¡¢£¤¥¦§
> ¨©ª«¬­®¯
> °±²³´µ¶·
> ¸¹º»¼½¾¿
> ÀÁÂÃÄÅÆÇ
> ÈÉÊËÌÍÎÏ
> ÐÑÒÓÔÕÖ×
> ØÙÚÛÜÝÞß
> àáâãäåæç
> èéêëìíîï
> ðñòóôõö÷
> øùúûüýþÿ
>
>
> 2012/2/4 Björn Helgason <gosinn at gmail.com>
>
>> In JHS
>>
>>    16 16$;u:&.>0,&.>3 u: 16 16 $a.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ┌┬┐├┼┤└┴
>> ┘│─
>>  !"#$%&'
>> ()*+,-./
>> 01234567
>> 89:;<=>?
>> @ABCDEFG
>> HIJKLMNO
>> PQRSTUVW
>> XYZ[\]^_
>> `abcdefg
>> hijklmno
>> pqrstuvw
>> xyz{|}~
>>
>>
>> 2012/2/4 Fraser Jackson <fraser.jackson at xtra.co.nz>
>>
>>> In J701jhs  the display character choice destroys the elegance of the
>>> boxing
>>> and LF, TAB and CR destroy the tidy appearance of the boxing.
>>>
>>>
>>> Is it possible to do better with both the J701 versions?
>>>
>>>
>
>
>