[Jprogramming] Atop u at v with v of negative monadic rank

[Roger Hui]

I thought it was with your proposal (now withdrawn)
that in g at f you get surprises wher the rank would be 
applied twice.  With the current definition in g at f 
the rank is not applied twice.



----- Original Message -----
From: Zsbán Ambrus <ambrus at math.bme.hu>
Date: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 7:38
Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] Atop u at v with v of negative monadic rank
To: Programming forum <programming at jsoftware.com>

> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Roger Hui <rhui000 at shaw.ca> wrote:
> > When would you ever say f"f ?
> 
> I wouldn't, but ]@f is the same.  If f"f is not the same as 
> f"f you
> get surprises with any g at f because it's as if the rank is 
> applied to f
> twice.