On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 9:18 AM, Raul Miller <rauldmiller at gmail.com> wrote: >> 0&(i&1@:~:) > > 0&(i.&1@:~:) 0 0 2 0 > 2 > 0&(i.&1@:~:) 0 0 9 0 > 2 > 0 (i.&1@:~:) 0 0 9 0 > 2 > (i.&1) 0 ~: 0 0 9 0 > 2 > (0 ~: 0 0 9 0) i.1 > 2 > > And, of course: > > 0 ~: 0 0 9 0 > 0 0 1 0 > thanks for the explanation.