[Jprogramming] Is this code reasonable?

[Dan Baronet]

Hi Raul, 
why is it not equivalent? I thought [: f g was always the same as f at g...


--- Raul Miller <rauldmiller at gmail.com> wrote:

>    [: +/ ] <.@% [ ^ 1 + [: i. <.@^.
> 
> Note that I "have to" use [: i. <.@^. because i.@<.@^. is not equivalent, even
> for scalar arguments.  (Try this next example both ways to see what I mean.)


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com