[Jprogramming] Leap Year (use of dot)
Roger Hui
rhui000 at shaw.ca
Sun Dec 23 16:34:53 HKT 2007
For the arguments here in question there are no differences
between the two, except one may be more efficient than
the other. (And I would need to do a benchmark to
settle this last question.)
BTW, with the nvv fork introduced since the original writing,
those phrases can be shortened:
m11 =: 0 ~:/ .= 4 100 400 |/ ]
m11a=: 0 ~:/@:= 4 100 400 |/ ]
----- Original Message -----
From: June Kim <juneaftn at gmail.com>
Date: Saturday, December 22, 2007 21:00
Subject: [Jprogramming] Leap Year (use of dot)
To: Programming forum <programming at jsoftware.com>
> >From the Phrase book,
>
> m11=: 0: ~:/ .= 4 100 400"_ |/ ]
>
> What's the effective difference with m11a, which uses @: instead
> of dot?
>
> m11a=.0: ~:/@:= 4 100 400"_ |/ ]
More information about the Programming
mailing list